What this move does
A polynomial equation with one unknown whose highest power is always looks like this once it is tidied up:
There are four roads to solving it. They all give exactly the same roots; they just take different amounts of effort:
- Tidy up first: move every term to the left to get , and read off , and (with their signs).
- Pick the easy road first: if it can be written as a number, just take square roots; if the left side works with the cross method, factor it into two linear factors and set each factor equal to .
- Otherwise, complete the square or use the formula: . The formula is really just “complete the square once and write down the result”.
- Substitute back to check, especially after moves like clearing denominators or taking square roots.
The graph above says the same thing: the roots of are the points where the parabola lands on the -axis.
Predict first
Sam solves : “Divide both sides by to get .” How many real roots does this equation actually have?
Two: and . Substitute : , which holds.
Dividing both sides by quietly assumed , so the root was “divided away”. The right way is to move the terms: , . The parabola below meets the -axis at two points, and neither can be left out.
Work through one
cannot be done with the integer cross method (there is no pair of integers with product and sum ). Completing the square always works.
Example: solve x² − 6x + 4 = 0 by completing the square
Step 1 / 5- Read the equation
, , . On the graph the parabola meets the -axis at two points, but neither is at an integer. That is why the cross method does not work.
Do exactly these steps for a general and you get the quadratic formula: divide by first, then complete the square,
One problem, three roads
One problem, several solutions
Solve .
Factoring
Cross method: (cross-multiply and add: ).
If a product of two numbers is , at least one of them is : or .
So or .
CostFastest, but only if you can find the factors.
Formula
.
.
, that is, or .
CostNo clever guessing, but more arithmetic and easy sign slips.
Completing the square
Divide both sides by : .
Add to both sides: .
, that is, or .
CostThe longest, but it shows where the formula comes from.
When it fails
Break it
Counterexample lab: remove one condition
Conclusion: can be solved with the quadratic formula ← still true?
, , : the formula gives , that is, and , matching the two intersections on the graph.
Move to and look: the parabola “straightens out” into the line , the denominator of the formula becomes , and the whole formula breaks down.
Now the equation is really the linear equation , with just one root, . So whenever the coefficient of contains a letter, first ask: could it be 0?
Practice
Solve . (Separate the two roots with a comma.)
Solve .
Solve .
Complete the square to write in the form . Find .
is a root of . Find the other root.