Concept stop · What is it?

Equilateral Triangles

In the Chinese book: 等边三角形

Two gifts: a constant sum of distances, and 60° turns that join segments.

📖 Chapter 10 of 《三角形与四边形》M8 Translation, Rotation and Reflection line

Before this stop, visit:Isosceles Triangles (Concept)

Hands first, words secondDrag anywhere inside the equilateral triangle. The three colored perpendiculars grow and shrink. What happens to the three-color bar on the right that stacks them end to end?

Loading figure…

Try this

  1. Drag : its distances to the three sides (orange, blue, green) each change. But the three-color bar on the right, which stacks the three pieces end to end, always reaches exactly as high as .
  2. Drag onto a side: one piece becomes , and the other two still add up to the altitude. Drag to the vertex : only one piece is left, and it is the altitude.
  3. Drag outside the triangle: the bar is now taller than the altitude. The result only holds for points inside (and on the sides).
  4. The three colored small triangles , , fit together into the whole triangle. That is the reason.

Predict first

A point inside an equilateral triangle is at distances , , from the three sides. What is the altitude of the triangle?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Why: count the area twice

The distances to the three sides add up to the altitude

Step 1 / 4
Loading figure…
  1. Join P to the three vertices

    The equilateral triangle is split into three pieces: , , .

Rotating by 60°: joining three segments into one path

The other gift of the equilateral triangle: rotate it about any vertex and one side lands exactly on another. More generally, a rotation about a point creates an equilateral triangle out of nothing: the center of rotation, a point, and its image.

Let's use it on a famous problem: find the point in that makes as small as possible.

Loading figure…
First drag yourself and push the sum as low as you can. Then click “Rotate △BPA 60° about B” and see where the three segments went.

When is PA + PB + PC smallest?

Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
  1. Three segments spreading out from one point

    , , are like three spokes. They are not joined end to end, so “the shortest path between two points is a straight segment” does not apply.

(If the triangle has an angle of or more, no such point exists, and the minimum is at that obtuse vertex. Try dragging down in the figure above.)

Remove one condition

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion: For every point inside, the sum of the distances to the three sides is constant

An equilateral triangle. Wherever is inside, the sum equals the altitude.

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

An equilateral triangle has altitude . A point inside it is at distances and from two of the sides. Find its distance to the third side.

Exercise 2Basic

An equilateral triangle has altitude . Find its side length.

Exercise 3Advanced

is a point inside the equilateral triangle with , , . Find in degrees.

Exercise 4Challenge

On the outside of , build equilateral triangles on side and on side . Join and . What is the acute angle between them, in degrees?

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Using “the sum of distances is constant” in any triangle

The wrong step: is any point inside an isosceles triangle, so the sum of its distances to the three sides equals the altitude to a leg.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The proof needs “all three sides equal ” so that can be taken out as a common factor. When the sides are not all equal, the sum is different near a long side and near a short side.

The right step: Only an equilateral triangle (for points inside it or on its sides) has “sum of distances to the three sides = altitude”. An isosceles triangle has a weaker result: for a point on the base, the sum of its distances to the two legs equals the altitude to a leg.

“The constant comes from “all three sides equal”; drop one and it is gone”

Exhibit

Rotating without saying where the equilateral triangle comes from

The wrong step: Rotate about to , so .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis A rotation only guarantees . To get you also need the angle of rotation to be : then is isosceles with apex angle , and only that makes it equilateral.

The right step: Write both steps: rotation ⇒ ; angle of rotation ⇒ ⇒ is equilateral ⇒ .

“60° is the key word, so write it down”