Concept stop · What is it?

Theorems on Proportional Segments in a Triangle

In the Chinese book: 三角形中与比例线段有关的几个定理

Angle bisector, Ceva, Menelaus. Three ratios multiply to 1, by area.

📖 Chapter 5 of 《三角形与四边形》M7 The Area Method lineM9 Building Similar Triangles line

Before this stop, visit:Similar Triangles (Skill)

Hands first, words secondDrag , , until the three lines pass through one point (the little red triangle in the middle shrinks to a dot). Where does the product gauge point then?

Loading figure…

Try this

  1. Drag , , anywhere: the three lines , , usually enclose a small red triangle, and the product gauge is not at .
  2. Click “Move F so CF passes through the meeting point”: the small triangle shrinks to a point and the gauge points exactly at . Now drag the vertex to change the shape of the triangle. The product does not move.
  3. Click “3 medians”: all three ratios are , so of course the product is . That is why the three medians meet at one point.
  4. Click “3 bisectors” and “3 altitudes”: the three ratios are all different, yet their product is still .

Ceva's theorem: if , , lie on the sides , , of , then

Predict first

We know and . For , , to meet at one point, what must be?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Why: the area method again

Proof of Ceva's theorem (concurrent ⇒ product is 1)

Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
  1. Let the three lines meet at P

    , , meet at a point . Joining to the three vertices makes three small triangles: , , .

The angle bisector theorem

If bisects with on , then : the angle bisector cuts the opposite side into two pieces in the same ratio as the two neighboring sides.

Loading figure…
Drag until the two angles are equal. What about and now? Then drag to try other triangles.

The proof takes two lines. is on the angle bisector, so it is the same distance from and from . Compute the ratio of the areas of and in two ways:

The left-hand sides are the same, so .

Menelaus's theorem

If a straight line meets the lines of the three sides of at (on ), (on ) and (on the extension of ), then again

Loading figure…
Drag and to turn the purple line; moves along with it. Does the product ever change?

Idea of the proof: through draw a line parallel to , meeting line at . This gives two pairs of similar triangles, with and . Substitute, and cancels. You can also use the common-side theorem, taking two points of the line as the shared side.

Remove one condition

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion:

is locked onto line .

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

In , , , , and bisects , meeting at . Find the length of .

Exercise 2Basic

, , lie on the sides , , of , and , , meet at one point. Given and , find .

Exercise 3Advanced

A straight line meets sides and of at and , and the extension of at . Given and , find .

Exercise 4Challenge

is a median of , is the midpoint of , and line meets at . Find .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Concluding “collinear” because the product is 1

The wrong step: , , all lie on the sides of the triangle (not on extensions), and , so , , are collinear.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis When all three points are inside the sides, no straight line can pass through all three sides at once. In this case a product of is about Ceva: the three lines , , are concurrent.

The right step: First count how many of the points are on extensions of the sides: or → Ceva (lines concurrent); or → Menelaus (points collinear).

“One formula, two theorems; count the points on extensions first”

Exhibit

The three ratios do not join up end to end

The wrong step: Ceva's theorem: .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The third ratio is upside down. The correct version walks once round the triangle, , and every ratio is “vertex to dividing point : dividing point to next vertex”.

The right step: . To check it, read the letters of the numerators and denominators in a row: you should end up back where you started.

“Start at a vertex and walk once round, back to the start”