What this move does
Three unknowns, three equations, and the method is one word: eliminate.
Each step is the elimination by adding or subtracting from the previous stop, just done a few more times:
- Pick the unknown that is easiest to eliminate (its coefficients are , or it is already missing from some equation).
- Use the same equation to eliminate this unknown from the other two, giving two equations with one unknown fewer.
- Eliminate once more between those two new equations, so only one unknown is left, and solve.
- Substitute back: put the value you found back in, layer by layer, to find the other unknowns. Finally check in the original equations.
The workbench above writes each equation as a row of coefficients. A coefficient that has become shows as “·”. When the elimination is done right, the “·” cells line up like the steps of a staircase.
Predict first
There are only two equations: and . Of the three unknowns, which one already has a definite value?
Subtract the equations and and vanish at the same time: , .
Substituting back only gives , so we still do not know and separately ( and work, and so do and ). With fewer equations than unknowns you usually cannot pin down every unknown, but sometimes you can pin down one of them, or some block (here ).
Work through one
Example: solve 2x + y − z = 3, x − y + 2z = 5, 3x + 2y + z = 10
Step 1 / 7- Pick an unknown first
The coefficient of is in ① and in ②, so eliminating is least work. Decision made: eliminate both times, both times using ①.
Look at the structure first
Following the steps always works, but a quick look before you start can sometimes save more than half the effort.
One problem, several solutions
Solve the system (①), (②), (③).
Step by step
① − ② eliminates : .
Add ③: , .
Substitute back: ① gives and ③ gives .
CostNo thinking needed, but more steps.
Add all three
Each of , and appears twice across the three equations. Add them all:
Subtract ①, ② and ③ from it in turn: , , .
CostYou first have to notice that the three equations “look alike”.
For a system where the three letters play the same role (a cyclic system), finding the block first is often fastest.
When it fails
Break it
Counterexample lab: remove one condition
Conclusion: a system of three linear equations in three unknowns has exactly one solution ← still true?
, , : the three equations are independent. Eliminate all the way and every unknown is determined.
Replace ③ with . It is really just ① + ②, so it says nothing new. Eliminate as usual: use ① to eliminate from ② and ③, then use ② to eliminate from ③. See what ③ turns into in the end.
③ becomes : it gives no new information. There are really only two equations, which cannot pin down three unknowns, so the system has infinitely many solutions.
If you change the right side of ③ to (), the same steps give : ③ contradicts ① and ②, and the system has no solution.
Practice
Given , and , find .
Solve the system , , . (Write , , in order, separated by commas.)
Solve the system , , . (Write , , in order.)
Given and , find .