What this move does
A linear equation in two unknowns (such as ) has infinitely many solutions. Draw them all and you get a line. Two equations together make a system, and what we want is the that satisfies both at once: the intersection of the two lines.
How do you work out the intersection? Multiply each equation by a number and add them:
The intersection makes both ① and ② true, so it must make this new equation true as well: the new line always passes through the intersection. If we choose and so that the coefficient of one unknown becomes exactly , the new equation has only one unknown left, and the new line is vertical or horizontal. One coordinate of the intersection can then be read off directly. This is elimination by adding or subtracting:
- Choose an unknown to eliminate, and multiply so that its coefficients in the two equations are equal or opposite.
- Subtract or add the two equations to eliminate it, and solve for the other unknown.
- Substitute that value back into either original equation to find the eliminated one.
- Check in both original equations.
Predict first
How many solutions does the system , have?
The same cannot equal both and . Subtracting the equations gives , which is impossible, so there is no solution.
Drawn out, they are two lines in the same direction: parallel, with no intersection.
Work through one
Example: solve 3x + 2y = 12, 5x − 3y = 1
Step 1 / 6- Just adding does not work
① + ② gives , and both unknowns are still there. The new line passes through the intersection, but it is slanted, so you cannot read off a coordinate.
Substitution is elimination too
There is more than one way to eliminate. Express one unknown in terms of the other, substitute it into the other equation, and again you are left with a single unknown.
One problem, several solutions
Solve the system (①), (②).
Elimination by adding or subtracting
The coefficients of are and , so just add:
Substitute into ①: , .
CostFastest when the coefficients are already opposite; otherwise multiply first.
Substitution
From ①, . Substitute into ②:
So .
CostHandy when an unknown has coefficient 1; otherwise fractions appear.
Both methods give the same answer: , . Which one to pick depends on which coefficients look friendlier.
When it fails
Break it
Counterexample lab: remove one condition
Conclusion: the system has exactly one solution ← still true?
and : . The two lines point in different directions, so they must meet at a point, and at only one point.
Replace ② with : . The left side of ② is exactly times the left side of ①, so the two lines point in the same direction. The figure already has , (that is, ①×2 − ②). Drag “const. in ②” and see how many different numbers of solutions are possible.
When the constant is not , elimination gives “ a non-zero number”: the lines are parallel and there is no solution. When the constant is exactly , ② is just times ①, and elimination gives : the lines coincide and there are infinitely many solutions. Either way, it is not “exactly one”.
Practice
Solve the system , . (Write first, then , separated by a comma.)
Solve the system , . (Write first, then .)
Solve the system , . (Write first, then .)
The system , in and has infinitely many solutions. Find .