What this move does
The earlier methods all depend on seeing a common factor or a formula. But some expressions are one step short of a formula. Take : there is and there is , but the middle term is missing.
So add it yourself, and take it away again: something out of nothing.
The two gray terms add up to , so the value has not changed at all, but the shape has: the first three terms are a perfect square, and the being subtracted is exactly . The result is a difference of squares.
- See what is missing: which term is needed to make a perfect square (or another formula)?
- Add and subtract the same term (adding a term), or split an existing term into two (splitting a term).
- Regroup and use a formula or take out a common factor. Finally, multiply back to check.
Predict first
To turn into , how many should you add (and subtract)?
, so the middle needs lots of . There is already , so you only need to add more:
Work through one
Example: factor x⁴ + 4
Step 1 / 6- The middle term is missing
There is and there is . To make a square of side , strips of are still missing (the empty places in the picture).
Splitting a term
Splitting a term means breaking a term that is already there into two, again so that grouping works.
Example: factor x³ − 3x + 2
Step 1 / 5- Three terms, no common factor, no formula
Try splitting the middle term . Into what? Into pieces that let the first two terms share a factor and show a familiar formula.
When it fails
You cannot split a term just any way. Split the middle term of into two terms and group them: which splits work?
Break it
Counterexample lab: remove one condition
Conclusion: After splitting, the groups fit together ← still true?
:
(): try every grouping.
However you group them, they never fit. “Which two numbers to split into” is exactly the question the next stop, the cross method, answers: the sum is and the product is .
Practice
Factor .
Factor .
Factor .
Factor by splitting a term.