Concept stop · What is it?

Functions and Quadratic Inequalities

In the Chinese book: 函数与二次不等式

No rhymes to learn. See where the parabola is above the x-axis and read off x.

📖 Chapter 4 of 《一次函数与二次函数》

Before this stop, visit:Functions and Quadratic Equations (Concept)

Hands first, words secondSwitch back and forth between and and watch where the thick line on the -axis moves. Then drag below zero and switch again.

Loading figure…

Try this

  1. Switch between and . Where does the shading move? The two solutions together cover almost the whole -axis. Which two points are missing?
  2. Switch to . What happens to the little circles at the endpoints? Why?
  3. Drag below zero. It is still “”, but the solution moves from “the two outside pieces” to “the middle”. What happened to the graph?
  4. Make positive again and drag upward until the graph leaves the -axis. What is the solution of now? And of ?

Solving just means asking: which part of the graph is above the -axis? The values directly below that part are the solution.

Predict first

What is the solution of the inequality ?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Why: a quadratic inequality in three steps

Example: solve x² − x − 6 < 0

Step 1 / 4
Loading figure…
  1. Step 1: see it as a function

    Let . The inequality asks: which make negative? For example, at we get , so that one counts.

Many people memorize “greater than: the outside; less than: the middle”. That is only true when and there are two different real roots. Draw the picture and you will know when it applies.

When a is negative

One problem, several solutions

Solve the inequality .

Read it from the picture

opens downward and meets the -axis at and . For a downward parabola, the part above the -axis is the arch between the roots: .

Loading figure…

CostNo rewriting, so the sign cannot go wrong; you must draw the opening the right way.

Multiply by −1 first

Multiply both sides by and flip the sign: . It opens upward, and “less than” means between the roots: .

Loading figure…

CostTurns it into the familiar upward case; the sign must flip, and that is the easiest step to get wrong.

The two pictures are upside down relative to each other, yet the thick line on the -axis is exactly the same. That is what “multiply by and flip the sign” looks like.

Holding for every x

If the whole parabola floats above the -axis, then holds for every . That needs two things: it opens upward (), and it never reaches the -axis ().

Loading figure…
holds for all real numbers. Drag down: at which notch does it stop holding for all x?

Example: holds for every real ; find the range of . It already opens upward, so we only need , that is, . Another way to see it: has minimum . If even the minimum is greater than , everything else is bigger still.

Remove one condition

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion: The solution of lies outside the roots (“greater than: the outside”)

When the parabola opens upward, and the part above the -axis really is the two pieces outside the roots.

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

How many integer solutions does the inequality have?

Exercise 2Basic

Among the satisfying , what is the largest?

Exercise 3Advanced

How many integer solutions does the inequality have?

Exercise 4Advanced

The solution of the inequality is exactly . Write .

Exercise 5Challenge

holds for every real . How many integers are there with this property?

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Multiplying by −1 without flipping the inequality sign

The wrong step: ; multiplying both sides by gives , so or .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis When you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign must flip. The correct result is .

The right step: , that is, , with solution . Check in the original: , correct.

“Multiply (or divide) by a negative and the sign turns round; check with a number at the end”

Exhibit

Taking the square root of x² > 4 as if it were an equation

The wrong step: , so .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis “” is not a meaningful range. says that the distance from to the origin is greater than , which is two pieces of the number line.

The right step: Rewrite it as . The graph is above the -axis outside the roots: or .

“You cannot take square roots of both sides of an inequality the way you do with an equation”

Exhibit

“Holds for all x”, missing the case where the leading coefficient is 0

The wrong step: holds for every real , so and , giving .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis When the inequality becomes , which also holds for every . The method above silently assumed it was quadratic.

The right step: Two cases: works; for we need and , that is, . Together: .

“If the leading coefficient contains a letter, look at the case where it equals 0 separately”