Concept stop · What is it?

Factoring over the Reals and the Complex Numbers

In the Chinese book: 实数集与复数集内的分解

“Cannot be split” depends on the numbers allowed. More numbers, finer factors.

📖 Chapter 11 of 《因式分解技巧》

Before this stop, visit:Cyclic and Symmetric Expressions (Concept)

Hands first, words secondClick “Over the rationals”, “Over the reals” and “Over the complex numbers” in turn, and count the factors. Then set n to 8 and click through them again.

Loading figure…

Try this

  1. , over the rationals: splits into factors, and one of them, , is quadratic. In the picture it is in charge of the two roots at the top and bottom, and .
  2. Switch to the reals: still . The two roots of are not on the real axis, so real numbers do not help.
  3. Switch to the complex numbers: splits too, giving linear factors, one for each root.
  4. Set to . Over the rationals there is a quartic factor ; over the reals it splits into two quadratics, with in their coefficients. Look at the picture: each quadratic is in charge of a pair of roots that are mirror images in the real axis.

In three sentences:

  • Over the complex numbers: a polynomial of degree splits into exactly linear factors.
  • Over the reals: when you factor completely, you only get linear factors and quadratic factors with no real roots.
  • Over the rationals: irreducible factors can have any degree (for example ).

For a quadratic (with rational coefficients), the discriminant tells you everything:

Over the rationalsOver the realsOver the complex numbers
the square of a rational numberfactorsfactorsfactors
positive, but not the square of a rationaldoes notfactorsfactors
negativedoes notdoes notfactors

Predict first

Over which numbers, at the least, can be factored?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Why

Why do roots off the real axis always pair up into a quadratic with real coefficients?

Let be a root on the unit circle at angle to the positive real axis. Its mirror image in the real axis is written (the conjugate). Multiply the two linear factors:

In the imaginary parts cancel exactly, and is the square of the distance to the origin. Both coefficients are real.

x⁸ − 1: the more numbers, the finer the split

Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
  1. Over the rationals

    . Four factors; is in charge of the four “diagonal” roots.

Remove one condition

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion: cannot be split

Over the reals, the in stays in one piece: its two roots have to stay together.

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

Factor completely over the reals. How many linear factors are there in the result?

Exercise 2Basic

Factor completely over the complex numbers. How many factors are there?

Exercise 3Advanced

Factor completely over the reals. How many factors are there?

Exercise 4Challenge

Over the reals, with . Find .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Not reading which numbers the problem allows

The wrong step: Factor over the reals: , done.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis Over the rationals that really is the end. But the problem says over the reals, so is allowed, and splits further.

The right step: . has no real roots, so over the reals this is as far as it goes.

“First read “over which numbers”, then decide whether you are done”

Exhibit

Negative discriminant = can never be split?

The wrong step: The discriminant of is , so it cannot be factored at all.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis only says it has no real roots, so it cannot be split over the reals. Over the complex numbers, every quadratic has two roots and splits into two linear factors.

The right step: Say it in full: is irreducible over the reals; over the complex numbers it equals , where .

““Cannot be factored” must always come with “over which numbers””